If you were gently defending them you wouldn't have gone out of your way to bash me. You really need to stop trying to act innocent.

Anywho stop derailing my topic with this measly thing and get back to the real subject.


By the way - I wouldn't have made this topic if I didn't hear people complaining about it.

_________________________________________

Nyx wrote:

If you were gently defending them you wouldn't have gone out of your way to bash me. You really need to stop trying to act innocent.

Anywho stop derailing my topic with this measly thing and get back to the real subject.


By the way - I wouldn't have made this topic if I didn't hear people complaining about it.

Truth

_________________________________________

Nyx wrote:

If you were gently defending them you wouldn't have gone out of your way to bash me. You really need to stop trying to act innocent.

Anywho stop derailing my topic with this measly thing and get back to the real subject.


By the way - I wouldn't have made this topic if I didn't hear people complaining about it.

then why is it just you and your friend (who you openly called momoho all of last wipe in the skype calls. keep that in mind momo) complaining NOW? i admit they are inactive and i gave an idea of how to fix the situation, but you ignored it in favor of blatantly attacking them for reasons other than their inactivity.

_________________________________________

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

If you were gently defending them you wouldn't have gone out of your way to bash me. You really need to stop trying to act innocent.

Anywho stop derailing my topic with this measly thing and get back to the real subject.


By the way - I wouldn't have made this topic if I didn't hear people complaining about it.

then why is it just you and your friend (who you openly called momoho all of last wipe in the skype calls. keep that in mind momo) complaining NOW? i admit they are inactive and i gave an idea of how to fix the situation, but you ignored it in favor of blatantly attacking them for reasons other than their inactivity.

The difference between you and me, is that I think if people don't have time to do their internet-assigned position they should be replaced with someone else.

The people I am speaking about are either black listed from the forum or don't like to post on the forum because of the depressing reason of their opinion being ignored or shat on by trolls.

Thirdly, how cute of you to try to get Momo mad at me hahaha. Yes at the beginning her and I were having troubles but we apologized and got over it. In fact, I still call her Momoho sometimes for laughs. Again stop bringing up **** that this topic isn't about.

_________________________________________

If people aren't active, they should be removed. That's kind of what you sign up for when you are appointed a specific position. Letha is decently active though, though I've never dealt with him in Icon matters so I have no idea how he works with that.

On another note though, this topic seriously got derailed starting with Sai's trolling. It is a simple request to get more active icon checkers. There's no need to bring any sorts of flames or personal feelings into it.


_________________________________________

Nyx wrote:

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

If you were gently defending them you wouldn't have gone out of your way to bash me. You really need to stop trying to act innocent.

Anywho stop derailing my topic with this measly thing and get back to the real subject.


By the way - I wouldn't have made this topic if I didn't hear people complaining about it.

then why is it just you and your friend (who you openly called momoho all of last wipe in the skype calls. keep that in mind momo) complaining NOW? i admit they are inactive and i gave an idea of how to fix the situation, but you ignored it in favor of blatantly attacking them for reasons other than their inactivity.

The difference between you and me, is that I think if people don't have time to do their internet-assigned position they should be replaced with someone else.

The people I am speaking about are either black listed from the forum or don't like to post on the forum because of the depressing reason of their opinion being ignored or shat on by trolls.

Thirdly, how cute of you to try to get Momo mad at me hahaha. Yes at the beginning her and I were having troubles but we apologized and got over it. In fact, I still call her Momoho sometimes for laughs. Again stop bringing up **** that this topic isn't about.

the problem with that is that they WERE doing it, they just kinda got swamped with glitches or irl. they're also a lot more active and easy to reach than the admins. (god forbid the admins log on more than once a month). Also, you should probably actually name your other supporters. you know, so if they dont actually support you we can have proof you're bs'ing. course you'd never do that

_________________________________________

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

If you were gently defending them you wouldn't have gone out of your way to bash me. You really need to stop trying to act innocent.

Anywho stop derailing my topic with this measly thing and get back to the real subject.


By the way - I wouldn't have made this topic if I didn't hear people complaining about it.

then why is it just you and your friend (who you openly called momoho all of last wipe in the skype calls. keep that in mind momo) complaining NOW? i admit they are inactive and i gave an idea of how to fix the situation, but you ignored it in favor of blatantly attacking them for reasons other than their inactivity.

The difference between you and me, is that I think if people don't have time to do their internet-assigned position they should be replaced with someone else.

The people I am speaking about are either black listed from the forum or don't like to post on the forum because of the depressing reason of their opinion being ignored or shat on by trolls.

Thirdly, how cute of you to try to get Momo mad at me hahaha. Yes at the beginning her and I were having troubles but we apologized and got over it. In fact, I still call her Momoho sometimes for laughs. Again stop bringing up **** that this topic isn't about.

the problem with that is that they WERE doing it, they just kinda got swamped with glitches or irl. they're also a lot more active and easy to reach than the admins. (god forbid the admins log on more than once a month). Also, you should probably actually name your other supporters. you know, so if they dont actually support you we can have proof you're bs'ing. course you'd never do that

I've nothing to prove to you. If they want to post on the forum about it(since I have made this open for them to share their opinion), they will do it.

_________________________________________

There should be more icon checkers period.
If they are proven competent and are able to put in the time, it is in NO WAY A bad thing PERIOD.
I've had questions about icons that i've asked checkers just to try to make the process smoother and have been repeatedly ignored. This is definately a case of more is better... that is all

_________________________________________

see, the problem is, since you've bs'd p hard in the past, you now need to back up your points a lot more than anyone else! now dont you regret bs'ing?

_________________________________________

Mint wrote:

i think the current checkers are doing fine, tho with rell's upload verb being broken and kiku having school we might want an extra checker or two, maybe even just temp until that gets sorted out? i dunno who the **** it'd be though, since we barely have anyone who can do the job. i guess i might be able to? maybe momo? couple other people maybe im not thinking of?

quoting this bit since it was ignored.

_________________________________________

Mint wrote:

see, the problem is, since you've bs'd p hard in the past, you now need to back up your points a lot more than anyone else! now dont you regret bs'ing?

They will come when they feel it is time. :)

_________________________________________

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

_________________________________________

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

im p sure that just reading over the icon rules and that one tutorial ...kati wrote? would p much be it. and then i guess ask the previous checkers how to work the verbs and ****?

_________________________________________

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

There's three good candidates like I said already.

_________________________________________

Nyx wrote:

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

There's three good candidates like I said already.

again, there's reasons why at least two of them arent. you are at this point, derailing your own thread

_________________________________________

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

There's three good candidates like I said already.

again, there's reasons why at least two of them arent. you are at this point, derailing your own thread

Uhhh no I am not. It is completely on topic. The people mentioned know how icons work and are active.

Game set match.

_________________________________________

Nyx wrote:

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

There's three good candidates like I said already.

again, there's reasons why at least two of them arent. you are at this point, derailing your own thread

Uhhh no I am not. It is completely on topic. The people mentioned know how icons work and are active.

Game set match.

i could repeat WHY they arent suitable, but you also COULD just reread the thread. you're leading your thread in a circle, dearest deylin.

_________________________________________

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

There's three good candidates like I said already.

again, there's reasons why at least two of them arent. you are at this point, derailing your own thread

Uhhh no I am not. It is completely on topic. The people mentioned know how icons work and are active.

Game set match.

i could repeat WHY they arent suitable, but you also COULD just reread the thread. you're leading your thread in a circle, dearest deylin.

I had the position before.

I did wonderfully.

I am the best candidate for such position because I know how to do it. Just saying.

_________________________________________

Nyx wrote:

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Mint wrote:

Nyx wrote:

Tetsugen wrote:

Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.

There's three good candidates like I said already.

again, there's reasons why at least two of them arent. you are at this point, derailing your own thread

Uhhh no I am not. It is completely on topic. The people mentioned know how icons work and are active.

Game set match.

i could repeat WHY they arent suitable, but you also COULD just reread the thread. you're leading your thread in a circle, dearest deylin.

I had the position before.

I did wonderfully.

I am the best candidate for such position because I know how to do it. Just saying.

if i remember correctly you were lazy and only had one way of being contacted so i had to be your errandgirl

_________________________________________

Dr. Letha wrote:

The only reason you want a new roster to consist of you, Momoko, and Haste is because, unlike myself or Kikuri, you can manipulate and viper them to agree with you so you have all the power (or at the absolute least, bend them towards your favor because they both seem to worship the ground you roll around on). Deny it all you want, but your ulterior motives have been pretty evident for some time now, considering all the ****storms that have been either based around you/your opinions on someone or fueled by you or someone you have some sort of direct power over.

_________________________________________