Terulia Testing
FFO Classic
 
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register ) Browse | Search | Files | Chat  
Forum Home > Terulia Forum Service: Main > FFO/Terulia Discussion > New Icon Checkers (pp 1 2 3 [4] 5)  
New Icon Checkers
Nyx 1:45 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Mint wrote:
Nyx wrote:
Mint wrote:
Nyx wrote:
Mint wrote:
Nyx wrote:
Tetsugen wrote:
Is there a forum that has informative information on what you need to know to be a checker?
Some material that could be read over to help people qualify to be a checker would probably be a good fix for the problem of not having good canidates.


There's three good candidates like I said already.

again, there's reasons why at least two of them arent. you are at this point, derailing your own thread


Uhhh no I am not. It is completely on topic. The people mentioned know how icons work and are active.

Game set match.

i could repeat WHY they arent suitable, but you also COULD just reread the thread. you're leading your thread in a circle, dearest deylin.


I had the position before.

I did wonderfully.

I am the best candidate for such position because I know how to do it. Just saying.
if i remember correctly you were lazy and only had one way of being contacted so i had to be your errandgirl


You made me laugh so hard I think I popped my jaw....

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Nyx 1:47 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Dr. Letha wrote:
Dr. Letha wrote:
The only reason you want a new roster to consist of you, Momoko, and Haste is because, unlike myself or Kikuri, you can manipulate and viper them to agree with you so you have all the power (or at the absolute least, bend them towards your favor because they both seem to worship the ground you roll around on). Deny it all you want, but your ulterior motives have been pretty evident for some time now, considering all the ****storms that have been either based around you/your opinions on someone or fueled by you or someone you have some sort of direct power over.


The people chosen are active and well-suited for the position of replacing the icon checkers.

Secondly, need I remind the public that you and Kikuri are the ones who committed the act of a circle jerk and vipering and stole my icon away from me when the rules were so vague on the matter?

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Mint 1:48 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Tried to Sleep with a Platypus
Posts: 164
Total: 234
if i hadnt wiped my harddrive because it was p much extreme hoarders: data edition and just kept the important **** i would have like 50%+ of the icons you put in when you were checker with me in your posse. because your only form of being contacted was skype. i would go through the process of taking the submission through msn, putting it through dropbox, sending it to you in skype, and relaying conversation between the two of you. it was ****ing insane and i have no idea why i did it

_________________________________________
 
Iris 1:49 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)

Group: Members
Posts: 124
Total: 153
Dr. Letha wrote:
Dr. Letha wrote:
The only reason you want a new roster to consist of you, Momoko, and Haste is because, unlike myself or Kikuri, you can manipulate and viper them to agree with you so you have all the power (or at the absolute least, bend them towards your favor because they both seem to worship the ground you roll around on). Deny it all you want, but your ulterior motives have been pretty evident for some time now, considering all the ****storms that have been either based around you/your opinions on someone or fueled by you or someone you have some sort of direct power over.


Silly Relleth please stop Trolling/Flaming Thank you

_________________________________________
 
Nyx 1:50 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Mint wrote:
if i hadnt wiped my harddrive because it was p much extreme hoarders: data edition and just kept the important **** i would have like 50%+ of the icons you put in when you were checker with me in your posse. because your only form of being contacted was skype. i would go through the process of taking the submission through msn, putting it through dropbox, sending it to you in skype, and relaying conversation between the two of you. it was ****ing insane and i have no idea why i did it


Evidence or all you say is a lie(which it is)...

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Niten 1:52 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 51
Total: 55
i don't give a **** what anyone says, right now apparently there isn't any reliable icon checkers, letha's upload doesn't work and i don't see kikuri much. having more icon checkers ISN'T going to harm the game in anyway considering icons are just for detail. Deylin was an icon checker before which means she IS qualified for the job. I'm not joining either of the butthurt sides I'm just going off what has been laid down in front of me.

_________________________________________
Niten has died at the hands of Knight!
Hekate casts Life on you!
Hekate has died at the hands of Mr Bob!
Kumano has died at the hands of Hashmal!
Black Wizard has died at the hands of Niten!
Niten says: I SHALL FIGHT BWAHAHAHAHAHA.
Hashmal casts Lit 2 on you!
Niten has died at the hands of Hashmal!
Hashmal has died at the hands of Hashmal!
 
Dr. Letha 1:53 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Elf
Posts: 883
Total: 1836
You initially claimed that the icon checkers were not active enough, and that was your reason for posting.

We proved that wrong.

We were, are, and always will be active enough to do our jobs.

Considering that was your reasoning for new icon checkers (and you're still using said claim), there's no need for replacing the currently active icon checkers.

Why is this topic still being posted in again?

_________________________________________
 
Nyx 1:55 AM on October 20, 2012 (+1/-0)
Unregistered
Dr. Letha wrote:
You initially claimed that the icon checkers were not active enough, and that was your reason for posting.

We proved that wrong.

We were, are, and always will be active enough to do our jobs.

Considering that was your reasoning for new icon checkers (and you're still using said claim), there's no need for replacing the currently active icon checkers.

Why is this topic still being posted in again?


Kikuri is inactive. You're a tad more active than Kikuri.

You never proved anything wrong. In fact, people are agreeing with ME more on the fact that there is an inactivity of the icon checkers.

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Sacrededge 1:57 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 54
Total: 57
reply to Dr. Letha:

The point of the matter is still at hand. I've seen people complain randomly about waiting for someone for like a week just to check a damn icon.

Also, you can't really say that you fit under the "reliable" icon checkers since your verb is broken as you say. If it's broken, then get it fixed, however in truth that may be done.

On another note, the original topic was a request to remove "inactive" icon checkers for more active members? All I've seen since then is one side defending said friends and bringing personal matters into it. Instead of everyone taking such a ****ing biased standpoint, why don't we actually work to agree on something rather than prance about accusing each other of lieing or saying that one another is wrong.

_________________________________________
 
Nyx 2:01 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Sacrededge wrote:
reply to Dr. Letha:

The point of the matter is still at hand. I've seen people complain randomly about waiting for someone for like a week just to check a damn icon.

Also, you can't really say that you fit under the "reliable" icon checkers since your verb is broken as you say. If it's broken, then get it fixed, however in truth that may be done.

On another note, the original topic was a request to remove "inactive" icon checkers for more active members? All I've seen since then is one side defending said friends and bringing personal matters into it. Instead of everyone taking such a ****ing biased standpoint, why don't we actually work to agree on something rather than prance about accusing each other of lieing or saying that one another is wrong.


I agree with you. But they just bring out the worst in me when I try to prove a point, even after I ask them to stop and they keep going.

I say remove Kikuri, keep Relleth.

Add a couple suitable people for the icon checking position.

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Dr. Letha 2:02 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Elf
Posts: 883
Total: 1836
Kikuri is active, people just don't realize it. Almost every night, Kikuri logs in and sits around on New Banian. It takes little to no effort to log onto a newbie to ask her, or if she is idle at that particular moment, to get someone to get her active again.

I'm on all the time, and people who really really have to talk to me about icon stuff will find that there are half a dozen ways to get in contact with me almost immediately any time throughout the day.

Pretty sure we're active.

EDIT: Well then someone wake Gaku up and get him over here to fix Upload-PC-Icon for me.


Nyx wrote:
I agree with you. But they just bring out the worst in me when I try to prove a point, even after I ask them to stop and they keep going.

L o l

_________________________________________
 
Mint 2:03 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Tried to Sleep with a Platypus
Posts: 164
Total: 234
Sacrededge wrote:
reply to Dr. Letha:

The point of the matter is still at hand. I've seen people complain randomly about waiting for someone for like a week just to check a damn icon.

Also, you can't really say that you fit under the "reliable" icon checkers since your verb is broken as you say. If it's broken, then get it fixed, however in truth that may be done.

On another note, the original topic was a request to remove "inactive" icon checkers for more active members? All I've seen since then is one side defending said friends and bringing personal matters into it. Instead of everyone taking such a ****ing biased standpoint, why don't we actually work to agree on something rather than prance about accusing each other of lieing or saying that one another is wrong.

ive been doing both! i even proposed that momo might make an okay checker! i dont want the current checkers completely gone though, because if they were more active they'd be the perfect people for the job. as it stands though, irl and glitchy verbs is stopping that. what i want is a checker or two that's under them that's actually active and is as easy to contact as them, if not moreso. i dont like dey as a checker because ontop of the (admittdly biased) **** rell said, she's hard as **** to contact.

_________________________________________
 
Sacrededge 2:07 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 54
Total: 57
reply to Dr. Letha:

And yet still, you don't understand that your supposed verb is broken. Has an attempt been made to try and fix it? As I said I'm unsure how, so please tell me you have at least attempted. I'm ok with you being an icon checker as long as you are doing what you are supposed to.

So, nothing against this kikuri person because I do not know him/her, but everytime that I may need help with having an icon checked I should make a character just to come and find him/her?

_________________________________________
 
Nyx 2:07 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Mint wrote:
Sacrededge wrote:
reply to Dr. Letha:

The point of the matter is still at hand. I've seen people complain randomly about waiting for someone for like a week just to check a damn icon.

Also, you can't really say that you fit under the "reliable" icon checkers since your verb is broken as you say. If it's broken, then get it fixed, however in truth that may be done.

On another note, the original topic was a request to remove "inactive" icon checkers for more active members? All I've seen since then is one side defending said friends and bringing personal matters into it. Instead of everyone taking such a ****ing biased standpoint, why don't we actually work to agree on something rather than prance about accusing each other of lieing or saying that one another is wrong.

ive been doing both! i even proposed that momo might make an okay checker! i dont want the current checkers completely gone though, because if they were more active they'd be the perfect people for the job. as it stands though, irl and glitchy verbs is stopping that. what i want is a checker or two that's under them that's actually active and is as easy to contact as them, if not moreso. i dont like dey as a checker because ontop of the (admittdly biased) **** rell said, she's hard as **** to contact.


Yes I am hard as **** to contact when I have skype, PMs, and the game client itself to get in contact with me about icons... lol. I think people would not agree with you on this matter, Mint.


Also no Kikuri is not active at all. Multiple people have stated this, stop trying to mentally deny the fact that she is not able to do her job.

I have asked her many times over the week, multiple times daily, to do something for me. She is never there to help anyone.

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Mint 2:09 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Tried to Sleep with a Platypus
Posts: 164
Total: 234
Nyx wrote:
Mint wrote:
Sacrededge wrote:
reply to Dr. Letha:

The point of the matter is still at hand. I've seen people complain randomly about waiting for someone for like a week just to check a damn icon.

Also, you can't really say that you fit under the "reliable" icon checkers since your verb is broken as you say. If it's broken, then get it fixed, however in truth that may be done.

On another note, the original topic was a request to remove "inactive" icon checkers for more active members? All I've seen since then is one side defending said friends and bringing personal matters into it. Instead of everyone taking such a ****ing biased standpoint, why don't we actually work to agree on something rather than prance about accusing each other of lieing or saying that one another is wrong.

ive been doing both! i even proposed that momo might make an okay checker! i dont want the current checkers completely gone though, because if they were more active they'd be the perfect people for the job. as it stands though, irl and glitchy verbs is stopping that. what i want is a checker or two that's under them that's actually active and is as easy to contact as them, if not moreso. i dont like dey as a checker because ontop of the (admittdly biased) **** rell said, she's hard as **** to contact.


Yes I am hard as **** to contact when I have skype, PMs, and the game client itself to get in contact with me about icons... lol. I think people would not agree with you on this matter, Mint.


Also no Kikuri is not active at all. Multiple people have stated this, stop trying to mentally deny the fact that she is not able to do her job.

I have asked her many times over the week, multiple times daily, to do something for me. She is never there to help anyone.

so we're supposed to hunt you down ingame? or magically gain knowledge of your skype? and aint your forum key different from your trc key? what if you log onto one and miss pms on the other?

_________________________________________
 
Nyx 2:11 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Mint wrote:

so we're supposed to hunt you down ingame? or magically gain knowledge of your skype? and aint your forum key different from your trc key? what if you log onto one and miss pms on the other?


yes because hunting me down in game is more than a "hey deylin i need you to upload this icon for me".


Also by you saying this, you realize how the rest of this feel in terms of Kikuri and Relleth. ;)

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
 
Mint 2:13 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Group: Tried to Sleep with a Platypus
Posts: 164
Total: 234
Nyx wrote:
Mint wrote:

so we're supposed to hunt you down ingame? or magically gain knowledge of your skype? and aint your forum key different from your trc key? what if you log onto one and miss pms on the other?


yes because hunting me down in game is more than a "hey deylin i need you to upload this icon for me".


Also by you saying this, you realize how the rest of this feel in terms of Kikuri and Relleth. ;)

which is why im not denying we need more checkers, just that you're not a good candidate at ALL

_________________________________________
 
Sacrededge 2:13 AM on October 20, 2012 (+1/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 54
Total: 57
reply to Mint:

So what you are basically saying is it comes down to personal reliability to do the job you were assigned. From a purely onlooker outlook, it seems that statement can go either way for either person. What I do think, is have two main icon checkers and 1-2 people underneath them to work with the main 2. So basically, for instance, Deylin and letha. They have two iconers underneath them to guarantee that someone will get in contact with the two main ones. Yes it seems like a tedious process, but at least there can be a bigger chance that people won't be left in the dark.

_________________________________________
 
Professor 2:13 AM on October 20, 2012 (+1/-0)

Group: FFO Admin
Posts: 511
Total: 942
Blah blah blah everyone stop arguing now. I'll try to talk to the other admins by tomorrow night about this stuff. If I can't talk to them I'll see about adding another checker for now. Thanks for not continuing this thread guys.

_________________________________________
 
Nyx 2:15 AM on October 20, 2012 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Sacrededge wrote:
reply to Mint:

So what you are basically saying is it comes down to personal reliability to do the job you were assigned. From a purely onlooker outlook, it seems that statement can go either way for either person. What I do think, is have two main icon checkers and 1-2 people underneath them to work with the main 2. So basically, for instance, Deylin and letha. They have two iconers underneath them to guarantee that someone will get in contact with the two main ones. Yes it seems like a tedious process, but at least there can be a bigger chance that people won't be left in the dark.

I actually love this idea.

Me and Letha as main icon checkers and then having a helper.

This way it also seperates out into the different groups(edit) so EVERYONE can be guaranteed their icon.


Edit: Okay Gale thank you.

_________________________________________
Po domain says: Yall seem to get butthurt over her EXISTENCE.
Forum Home > Terulia Forum Service: Main > FFO/Terulia Discussion > New Icon Checkers (pp 1 2 3 [4] 5)  
Color Scheme:
   
 
1 forum user ( 0 registered, 1 guest, 0 bots ) currently viewing this topic.
 
This page was generated in 0.3 seconds.
Terulia forums are hosted for free at www.terulia.com [ Terms of Service: Updated 4/28/2011 ].