Terulia Testing
FFO Classic
 
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register ) Browse | Search | Files | Chat  
Forum Home > Terulia Forum Service: Main > Guides and Moderation > Another Election (pp 1 2 3 4 [5] 6)  
Another Election
Huelock 2:50 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Members
Posts: 336
Total: 491
reply to Po:

I'm pretty sure that if an admin witnesses a rule violation, he can use banhammer without having proofs.

_________________________________________
 
Rarity 2:52 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 670
Total: 1267
i hear what your sugar-coating to make yourself seem justified and ontop of the world, like your more intelligent

anyway, black firewalled your body and you raged, you went all Q.Q butthurt on him and thre the banhammer

oh wait, those are your side's words right? claiming every action is butthurt right?

sounds to me like your ass was bleeding when you banned ace shatter iwam and blax

_________________________________________

Letha says: Mint is more of a man than me.
 
Huelock 2:54 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Members
Posts: 336
Total: 491
reply to Po:

Or they just broke the rules, simple as that.

_________________________________________
 
King Blax 2:57 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
reply to WyrmDean:

But I know you do know that Police, attends to pull people over for nothing. That logic there really fails.

As people said, nobody is perfect, or can do a perfect job. But what you are trying to do is actually working against those that haven't been through these abuses.

Police officers attend to pull over people who are high and or drunk. Point proven, they still have evidence, haven't you noticed, because police officers cliam people have ran the red light doesn't mean they did. It can be what they "wanted" to see.... It can be because of their skin or because of the crappy mood they are in. That's why the govornment put in evidence to see if they did do such. LIKE CAMERAS NOW! So any other logics you would like to attempt, I'm all eyes. ;}

Point proven is, to have a court discussion, it must have proof or a witness, and in which, you have none. But your own say so.

_________________________________________
 
Rarity 2:58 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 670
Total: 1267
im pretty sure that if a player needs to take ss' and give proof to an admin to justify a ban, then an admin would have to at the least present some sort of proof

which is what is going on now, players who suck dean's e-cock can just tell him **** without ss' and he'll throw out bans, claiming such ss' were actually provided, and that they werent just edited bs lies

how bout this, next time i see a rule broken, i wont take ss' or give proof and ill try getting them banned, will it work? no

but will it work if im an admin? apparently

admins are just as normal and human as the rest of us and make mistakes and dont always know the entire scenario, maybe someon doesnt know its a bug they are using, maybe they never knew it was, in which case youmake them aware, not just ban cause you assume **** then never show proof of it ever happening, also, i can firewall on my black wizard and relog to another char, is that bug abuse?

or how about this, i firewall somewhere like....I don't know giants, then later relog but my fire is still there and someone dies in it, OH BAN ME BAN ME PLEASE

if firewalling then relogging is a bug make it so you CANT RELOG when you have an active turf fire or firewall out, however dean just got butthurt one day when blax killed him and is permabanned, he also doesnt want to provide proof because he has none obviously

_________________________________________

Letha says: Mint is more of a man than me.
 
Huelock 3:06 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Members
Posts: 336
Total: 491
reply to Po:

So, where are your proofs?

_________________________________________
 
Draven 3:07 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Draaaaaaaaaaaaaven
Posts: 255
Total: 374
When the community is always acting up and toeing the line, don't be surprised when the hammer comes down on you.

From my own reading as an "outsider" considering I do not play nor care about FFO, it appears more to me as the community complaining that they cannot get away with everything their hearts desire. The community needs a severe overhaul, starting with the mindset of "What can I get away with?"

The community needs to realize that the community has to stay together lest the game turn into a wasteland with less than 10 people playing daily, with no new players coming in. The current mindset people have of "HEY ITS THAT NEW GUY! KILL HIM IN AN ABUSIVE FASHION LIKE WE WERE KILLED!" does not contribute to this game's well being.

Constantly killing people once they leave newbie protection, only stopping to "avoid the banhammer" as it appears folks like Tyrael do, is also counter to the game's growth. These things are not good for this game as a whole.

I'm not going to comment any on the administration, as my point is as thus:

The community is the group that needs to be worked on, not the administration.

Have a nice day.

_________________________________________
 
Huelock 3:10 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Members
Posts: 336
Total: 491
Kumog wrote:
When the community is always acting up and toeing the line, don't be surprised when the hammer comes down on you.

From my own reading as an "outsider" considering I do not play nor care about FFO, it appears more to me as the community complaining that they cannot get away with everything their hearts desire. The community needs a severe overhaul, starting with the mindset of "What can I get away with?"

The community needs to realize that the community has to stay together lest the game turn into a wasteland with less than 10 people playing daily, with no new players coming in. The current mindset people have of "HEY ITS THAT NEW GUY! KILL HIM IN AN ABUSIVE FASHION LIKE WE WERE KILLED!" does not contribute to this game's well being.

Constantly killing people once they leave newbie protection, only stopping to "avoid the banhammer" as it appears folks like Tyrael do, is also counter to the game's growth. These things are not good for this game as a whole.

I'm not going to comment any on the administration, as my point is as thus:

The community is the group that needs to be worked on, not the administration.

Have a nice day.


This

_________________________________________
 
Draven 3:11 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Draaaaaaaaaaaaaven
Posts: 255
Total: 374
Also, those who were flaming in this topic (Flaming is a Terms of Service violation for public forums. Ignorance is no excuse) will be removed from these forums for a period of one week. Have a nice day.

EDIT: A REMINDER TO FOLKS. If someone is flaming, don't jump into the fray flaming back at them. PM me so it can be dealt with.

_________________________________________
 
Grameramera 4:46 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Best Pony
Posts: 893
Total: 1255
There are only 2 options I'm considering at this point.

1) Leave everything as it is.
2) Return to a period of "anarchy".

I'm not going to micromanage the admins; this defeats the purpose of having admins.

_________________________________________
ScouSin: Damn you Gaku! Damn you and your; "Be patient, and if you don't want to, tough, because I'm going to be all mystical about it!"
KingBlax: It's telling you to go outside, with no flash-light in the woods, and find a dead body, you eat dinner if you find 1. You die in the wilderness if you don't find 1 or at least bring something interesting back.
./personal_problem.sh -q > /dev/null 2>&1 &
 
PcP 4:50 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 118
Total: 214
I say we go with option number 2 seeing as people like to try to flex the rules to thier advantage to get people banned.

_________________________________________
 
Guy 5:04 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
I vote 2 As well.

_________________________________________
 
Reap 5:07 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 88
Total: 105
reply to Grameramera:

Option 2

_________________________________________
Photobucket
 
Shane 5:12 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: King of the Bidoofs
Posts: 1146
Total: 1856
I vote 1.

As it stands with how the game works and the current community, another period of anarchy is likely to drive the game into the ground.

_________________________________________
SMUG.MOMENTAI
 
Magnus Sforzando 5:21 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Straightest Man on FFO
Posts: 563
Total: 1339
I like option one.

you guys ***** when there are no admins, and then you ***** when there are admins who do the job. Make up your mind.

Truefact: Don't go out of your way to be a god damn asshole and you won't get banned.

_________________________________________
 
Sarmo 5:21 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Total: 98
I understand why some of you may be kneejerk-voting for anarchy, but I hope you all put some thought into this before asking for it. While it's true that some try to twist the current rules to suit them, an anarchy mode also means there isn't any more lines to toe in the first place.

If you really want these sort of things to stop with anarchy, it'll be up to you to make the offenders' gameplay experience as dismal as possible in order to deter them from picking on others.

_________________________________________
 
PcP 5:28 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 118
Total: 214
when we do that we get faked stories and screenshots to get us banned

_________________________________________
 
Magnus Sforzando 5:32 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)

Group: Straightest Man on FFO
Posts: 563
Total: 1339
I hope for your sakes that we don't get option 2. You guys are seriously gunna be wishing for admins.

_________________________________________
 
PcP 5:35 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Group: Members
Posts: 118
Total: 214
I don't know about that magnus, I'm pretty sure if anarchy gets reinstated you'll end up quitting again, because I know I for one will be rolling over any ****er who talks ****.

_________________________________________
 
Pkftw 6:08 PM on February 28, 2011 (+0/-0)
Unregistered
Hey shane ignorance isn't an excuse. If she didn't know he was killed that many times she should have still been banned. Remember how people toss that around so often. Yeah and she should have asked people before going on a killing spree. Basically what i'm saying is these rules are flawed almost as flawed is the current admin system.

Option 2

were gonna wish for admins? are you gonna bring that upon us with your *** rants on dsay and your ****ty chars that you "won" with?

_________________________________________
Forum Home > Terulia Forum Service: Main > Guides and Moderation > Another Election (pp 1 2 3 4 [5] 6)  
Color Scheme:
   
 
1 forum user ( 0 registered, 1 guest, 0 bots ) currently viewing this topic.
 
This page was generated in 0.3 seconds.
Terulia forums are hosted for free at www.terulia.com [ Terms of Service: Updated 4/28/2011 ].