Terulia Testing
FFO Classic |
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register ) | Browse | Search | Files | Chat |
Forum Home > Terulia Forum Service: Main > FFO/Terulia Bug Reports > something related to magic resistance (pp [1] 2 3) |
something related to magic resistance | |||
Shane | 9:01 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: King of the Bidoofs Posts: 1146 Total: 1856 |
Between the original Scan on Hashmal and Minuet's death, he did not change any gear, as shown by these three pictures.
So then, Minuet's Light does: Many elements were used on Hashmal and none of them broke three digits, whether or not he was weak to them. The best I can presume about this issue is that it is related to the magic armor bug, which is a known issue and has been reported and bumped on multiple occasions. Either way, there's definitely something buggy going on. _________________________________________ SMUG.MOMENTAI
|
||
Magnus Sforzando | 9:14 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: Straightest Man on FFO Posts: 563 Total: 1339 |
Even in regards to his resistance to fire and water, I still only managed to do about 80 or so. But then I again Im not really sure about the antis he had, except for anti earth. On the converse it also says that Sasha is extremely weak to dark, and my dark 3 never did more than 80 or points of damage to her.
_________________________________________ |
||
Sai So Beast | 9:16 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
reply to Thorshane Rowle:
your so smart, attacking someone on palisades and expecting high damage _________________________________________ |
||
Magnus Sforzando | 9:17 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: Straightest Man on FFO Posts: 563 Total: 1339 |
Unless there was a recent update to palisades lowering damage, it's bugged. Palisades as I understood only served to increase the fizzle rate.
_________________________________________ |
||
Sai So Beast | 9:19 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
not the fizzle rate, magic defense
magic defense no longer determines fizzle rate, and reduces magic damage much more than before GG you got ownt by a black man _________________________________________ |
||
Magnus Sforzando | 9:20 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: Straightest Man on FFO Posts: 563 Total: 1339 |
Armor and palisades are not the same.
_________________________________________ |
||
Shane | 9:20 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: King of the Bidoofs Posts: 1146 Total: 1856 |
Sai So Beast wrote:
reply to Thorshane Rowle: So extremely weak to light = 80 damage. _________________________________________ SMUG.MOMENTAI
|
||
Sai So Beast | 9:21 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
reply to Reguchris Black:
yes but it works the same way now palisades have ALWAYS increased m def, the m def stat works differently now _________________________________________ |
||
Sai So Beast | 9:22 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
reply to Thorshane Rowle:
Yes, on palisades Plus Dawn sux and prolly has ****ty ass light _________________________________________ |
||
Shane | 9:22 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: King of the Bidoofs Posts: 1146 Total: 1856 |
Sai So Beast wrote:
reply to Reguchris Black: which is the bug. extremely weak to light = 80 damage. _________________________________________ SMUG.MOMENTAI
|
||
Shane | 9:23 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: King of the Bidoofs Posts: 1146 Total: 1856 |
Sai So Beast wrote:
reply to Thorshane Rowle: I was the one that Lighted Hashmal who was extremely weak to light for 80 damage. _________________________________________ SMUG.MOMENTAI
|
||
Sai So Beast | 9:25 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
reply to Thorshane Rowle:
it isnt a bug since fizzle rate is now based on the caster only m def cant increase fizzle rate instead it reduces magic damage palisades increase your m def by **** tons and im pretty sure the increase is based on your chars m def itself hashmal is a capped BW its not hard its simple if I can understend it _________________________________________ |
||
Magnus Sforzando | 9:25 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: Straightest Man on FFO Posts: 563 Total: 1339 |
spell's actual effect (damage and/or duration) varies based on *o
- relative height i.e. walls *o I stand correced. In which case There is no way that a character who dark would do around 300-400 under normal circumstances, who is also now extremely weak to it, so figure it goes up another 100 points or so, that palisades should reduce damage THAT drasticly, and if thats the case it should be fixed to reduce damage less. _________________________________________ |
||
Sai So Beast | 9:25 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
Thorshane Rowle wrote:
Sai So Beast wrote:reply to Thorshane Rowle: you have ****ty light too it was a joke all light is ****ty now plus your WW has a chronos so its not even strong compared to other wws light _________________________________________ |
||
Shane | 9:25 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: King of the Bidoofs Posts: 1146 Total: 1856 |
extremely weak to light
light 2 did 80 damage I'm not sure how you don't understand the issue with this. _________________________________________ SMUG.MOMENTAI
|
||
deanbad | 9:27 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: Members Posts: 1224 Total: 2374 |
If this is related to
spell's actual effect (damage and/or duration) varies based on *o - relative height i.e. walls *o then the damage reduction needs to be reduced. There's no way a spell that is doing increased damage due to elemental extreme elemental weakness should be doing such a low amount of damage. _________________________________________ "Take this shipment of supplies to Gillian, and try not to murder anyone's parents along the way, alright?"
|
||
Sai So Beast | 9:27 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
Reguchris Black wrote:
spell's actual effect (damage and/or duration) varies based on *o i would think it would do 200-300 to hashmal.. extremely weak to light doesnt mean full dark gear, it means 2-3 pretty okay/good peices of unholy plus raro has a chronos and light got ass nerfed, so yea plus its a capped BW with high base m def plus wall bonus is based on your m def previously to steppin on it if i remember rite _________________________________________ |
||
Dawn | 9:27 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: Members Posts: 39 Total: 57 |
Sai So Beast wrote:
reply to Thorshane Rowle: I'm pretty sure no one is wanting to discuss this matter with you. Plus, for the record, my light spells are capped except for L3, which is 45. Either way the situation goes, 80 damage is insignificant for players who are proffed well. _________________________________________ |
||
Shane | 9:28 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Group: King of the Bidoofs Posts: 1146 Total: 1856 |
Sai, please stop posting in my thread.
_________________________________________ SMUG.MOMENTAI
|
||
Sai So Beast | 9:29 PM on March 27, 2011 | (+0/-0) | |
Unregistered |
consider that if he is on a palisade my wws light does like, 30s to him so this makes sense since elemental weakness is the last thing multid into it
30 damage x3 from weakness is different than 200 damage 3x then divided by how much the wall defense is but ele gear gets multid last which is why this happens _________________________________________ |
Forum Home > Terulia Forum Service: Main > FFO/Terulia Bug Reports > something related to magic resistance (pp [1] 2 3) |
1 forum user ( 0 registered, 1 guest, 0 bots ) currently viewing this topic. |
This page was generated in 0.3 seconds.
Terulia forums are hosted for free at www.terulia.com [ Terms of Service: Updated 4/28/2011 ]. |